New review of byte-compile warnings #9
No reviewers
Labels
No Label
bug
documentation
duplicate
enhancement
good first issue
help wanted
invalid
question
wontfix
No Milestone
No Assignees
1 Participants
Notifications
Due Date
No due date set.
Dependencies
No dependencies set.
Reference: tec/screenshot.el#9
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
No description provided.
Delete Branch "master"
Deleting a branch is permanent. Although the deleted branch may continue to exist for a short time before it actually gets removed, it CANNOT be undone in most cases. Continue?
Hi @tecosaur,
Here is my second review of byte-compile warnings.
Thanks for this! I'd not a fan of the code duplication though. I just stumbled across an example of someone using
eval-when-compile
to have the macros defining variables be expanded for compilation. I'm going to push a commit trying that and hope that it does the trick 🤞.Hmmm. Unfortunately it seems
eval-when-compile
tries to execute the expanded macro results too which I think causes the error seen in the CI for the last commit. The idea of this approach (expand macros at compile) does seem nicer to me — if it can be made to work. Might you have any ideas?Hi! At the moment I don't know how to solve it, but I will investigate...
By the way, you told me about a problem with "wrapped lines", but I don't know what do you mean with "wrapped lines". Could you clarify this to me? Thanks!
Please let me know if you have any ideas. Regarding wrapped lines, I'm talking about the effect of
visual-line-mode
which can cause a long line of text to be split onto another line - and so another line is needed in the screenshot frame but the line count is unchanged. Does that make sense?Hi @tecosaur ,
I have tried several things in order to avoid byte-compile warnings, but they didn't work without code duplication. I am sorry.
About wrapped lines, I understand, I will have a look (depending on time), but you can close this issue if you want.
Thanks!
No need to be sorry, I really appreciate you spending time trying to help out with this.
Glad to hear you're willing to investigate the wrapped lines issue 🙂.
This should be resolved in
e7a8941d9f
now.Pull request closed